| In 1964, as questions started being asked in
Quebec about federalism's future, the Council was born. It quickly
started making the case for Canada, becoming national in scope.
It has adapted constantly to changing times. Continuously but
unobtrusively, it gets Canadians involved in discussions pertinent
to the smooth operation of their political institutions.

Tensions between English and French-speaking
Canadians - the Council's beginnings
In 1964, a group of Quebecers, alarmed by growing tensions
between French and English-speaking Canadians, formed the
Canada Committee, forerunner of the Council.
Quebec's Quiet Revolution was bringing about rapid change.
There were calls for major constitutional reform, which gave
rise to an embryonic separatist movement.
Nationally, the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism
was laying the groundwork for such reforms as the official
languages policy. Its goal was to ensure that the federal
government would provide citizens with services in the official
language of their choice.
Western Canada felt left out of these debates and, for a
number of reasons, its sense of alienation started to increase.
During this period, the Canada Committee's members built
bridges in every region by working hard to better understand
the roots of these tensions, to shed light on their significance
and to find solutions.
Ultimately, the committee became The Canadian Unity Council,
a name that better reflected its evolving mission.
To counter the separatist threat,
a coalition of Canadians
In 1976, Canada was confronted with a separatist government
in Quebec that was preparing the way for a referendum on independence.
The Council, aware that this concerned all Canadians and
was not just a matter to be settled among Quebecers, organized
a broad coalition of federalists from all political parties.
As the 1980 referendum approached, the Council moved on several
fronts: it kept Canadians regularly informed about what was
at stake; it published studies on the relationship between
Canada and its provinces; it explained the flexibility of
Canadian institutions, and the federal system, as well as
the great values that underpin a country with strongly defined
regions.
Thus, during one of the most important debates in the country's
history, the Council, while adhering to its status as a non-partisan
organization, accomplished its mission to educate, inform
and get citizens involved.

Post referendum, an intense constitutional
debate
During the referendum campaign, the federal government had
promised that a "NO" to separatism would be a "YES"
to constitutional change. The constitution was patriated,
amended and The Charter of Rights and Freedoms was entrenched.
Nevertheless, in 1982, the constitutional debate re-ignited
and continued into the early 90s.
Throughout this period of constitutional and political turmoil,
the Council, backed by its volunteers, and in keeping with
its mission and non-partisan character, energetically supported
the work of those who took part in the discussion throughout
the country.

A new referendum followed by a
cool-down
Despite an intense period of constitutional debate among opinion
leaders, broad public interest in the issue waned. It was
in these circumstances, that Canadians suddenly faced the
prospect of a new referendum challenge to national unity.
Again, the Council played a central role, providing solid
information about the Canadian federation and pointing up
its advantages. It heightened Canadians' awareness of federalism
as a very sophisticated form of political organization, an
ever-changing balancing act.
In the wake of this tumult, which was also marked by a major
decision by the Supreme Court of Canada about the referendum
process, Canadians seem ready to set constitutional negotiations
aside for a while.
|